|
EPA's interim release for FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883 discusses MACT floor limits for 17 hazardous air pollutants, addressing comments from SunCoke and detailing the agency's rationale for differing standards in the Final Rule.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005741
|
1 |
|
EPA's interim release regarding FOIA ID 2025-EPA-04883 discusses concerns raised by SunCoke about the adequacy of MACT floor emission limits for Bypass/Waste Heat Stacks, citing insufficient data and the need for reevaluation of these limits.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005746
|
1 |
|
SunCoke's comment letter dated February 19, 2024, addresses EPA's Final Rule on emission limits, arguing that the agency incorrectly stated no alternate work practices were proposed and conflicts with startup and shutdown requirements.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005750
|
1 |
|
SunCoke requests the EPA to stay the effectiveness of the Final Rule set for July 5, 2024, pending reconsideration and judicial review, citing potential unnecessary compliance costs and procedural violations.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005761
|
1 |
|
EPA's interim release for FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883 discusses SunCoke's likelihood of success in contesting the agency's inadequate public comment period of 45 days for complex rule amendments, contrary to statutory requirements.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005762
|
1 |
|
SunCoke's request to the EPA argues for a stay of the Final Rule's compliance requirements pending judicial review, citing potential economic harm to the coke industry and job losses in disadvantaged areas.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005769
|
1 |
|
Declaration by John Quanci, Vice President of Technology at SunCoke Energy, Inc., supporting a motion for stay pending review in case No. 24-1287 against the EPA, filed on September 30, 2024.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005774
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287, filed on 09/30/2024, includes a statement from a SunCoke executive detailing their educational background, professional experience, and familiarity with SunCoke's facilities and operations.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005775
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on September 30, 2024, includes a declaration discussing SunCoke's heat recovery process and its environmental advantages, emphasizing the importance of metallurgical coke in steel production.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005776
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on September 30, 2024, discusses differences between ByP and HNR facilities in chemical recovery and notes EPA's recognition of SunCoke's cokemaking process as the industry MACT.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005777
|
1 |
|
On July 5, 2024, the EPA finalized a rule establishing 17 new MACT floor emission limits for Hazardous Air Pollutants, affecting SunCoke's operations, with a compliance deadline of December 5, 2025.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005778
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 critiques the EPA's Final Rule on MACT floor emissions, citing multiple errors that render compliance unachievable for SunCoke, necessitating immediate costly testing and control installations.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005779
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses SunCoke's argument that the EPA's MACT floor standards were based on insufficient data from 2016 and 2022, leading to potential severe harm for the company.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005780
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 includes data indicating that multiple SunCoke facilities, including HH1, failed to meet the MACT floor emissions limits for particulate matter and mercury.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005781
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses EPA's failure to fully consider relevant data regarding SunCoke's compliance with MACT floor limits, impacting cost and compliance timelines.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005782
|
1 |
|
A court document filed on September 30, 2024, in USCA Case #24-1287 critiques the EPA's insufficient data and assumptions regarding SunCoke's compliance with MACT floor emissions limits for mercury.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005783
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses EPA's challenges in setting MACT floor limits for emissions due to insufficient data, particularly for mercury and acid gases in SunCoke's operations.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005784
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses EPA's failure to include relevant data in setting new MACT floor limits, impacting SunCoke's ability to comply with testing and control requirements.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005785
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses SunCoke's incurred testing costs nearing $3 million and AECOM's role in assisting with environmental compliance and testing for HAPs across SunCoke's plants.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005786
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses SunCoke's need to install emissions controls at its HH1 facility to comply with new MACT floor limits for mercury and particulate matter.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005787
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on September 30, 2024, details SunCoke's projected costs exceeding $59 million for mercury and particulate matter controls at HH1 to comply with emissions regulations by December 5, 2025.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005788
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses projected compliance costs for SunCoke facilities, estimating a minimum of $62 million for immediate controls and potential increases to $99 million based on future testing results.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005789
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on September 30, 2024, discusses potential compliance costs for SunCoke, estimating up to $1.2 billion for facility upgrades by the December 5, 2025 deadline.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005791
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses SunCoke's PAH emissions testing results from June 2017, indicating marginal compliance with MACT floor limits and potential costs of $260 million for necessary corrections.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005790
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 includes SunCoke's claims regarding compliance challenges with EPA's MACT floor limits, detailing specific emissions data and testing results from November 2020.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005792
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses particulate matter emissions from IHO's bypass vent stacks, indicating that if the Final Rule were in effect, emissions would have exceeded limits in both 2020 and 2021.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005793
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses safety risks associated with induced draft fans and vent stacks in relation to maintaining negative pressure during power failures.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005794
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on 09/30/2024 discusses SunCoke's compliance challenges with new MACT vent stack emissions limits and its critical role in supplying coke to the U.S. steel industry.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005795
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287, filed on September 30, 2024, discusses the critical role of SunCoke in the U.S. steel industry, noting its 40% share of domestic coke supply and advanced production facilities.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005796
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1287 filed on September 30, 2024, includes a declaration by John Quanti regarding the financial impact of a proposed Final Rule on the coke industry and employment at SunCoke facilities.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005797
|
1 |
|
Denka Performance Elastomer LLC submitted a FOIA request on September 10, 2025, seeking a Presidential Exemption to extend compliance deadlines under the Clean Air Act for its Neoprene Production Facility in LaPlace, Louisiana, from July 15, 2026, to July 15, 2028.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005828
|
1 |
|
Denka Performance Elastomer LLC's Environmental Affairs Manager, Chris Meyers, outlines challenges in meeting EPA's Section 112 standards, citing a lack of available technology and requesting a two-year extension for compliance due to safety and installation concerns.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005829
|
1 |
|
On September 10, 2025, Jeffrey R. Holmstead submitted a request to the President for a two-year extension for DPE's compliance with CAA Section 112 standards for its Neoprene Production Facility in LaPlace, Louisiana, citing national security interests.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005830
|
1 |
|
A declaration dated July 26, 2024, outlines significant cost estimates for LDAR and fenceline monitoring equipment, totaling $8.15 million, which the author argues exceed EPA's proposed figures.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005855
|
1 |
|
A June 14, 2024 letter from industry representatives to EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan requests reconsideration and stays of three EPA rules affecting the U.S. integrated steel industry, citing concerns over economic competitiveness and environmental impacts.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005873
|
1 |
|
A letter dated June 14, 2024, from the U.S. Senate to EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan urges reconsideration and stays of three EPA rules affecting the domestic integrated steel industry, citing concerns over economic competitiveness and environmental impacts.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005899
|
1 |
|
The EPA's Copper Rule, issued on May 13, 2024, faced a petition for reconsideration from Freeport-McMoRan Inc. on July 12, 2024, which remains unresolved as of February 3, 2025.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005909
|
1 |
|
The EPA's interim release for FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883 discusses the increasing global demand for copper, emphasizing its critical role in electric vehicles and renewable energy projects, while also noting potential supply shortages.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005917
|
1 |
|
A report from Freeport-McMoRan discusses the projected shortfalls in global copper production by 2035, emphasizing the critical role of the Miami Smelter in U.S. national security and economy.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005918
|
1 |
|
Luminant submitted a request for a two-year exemption from the MATS RTR compliance standards for Martin Lake Units 1-3, citing unavailability of required technology and national security interests, as outlined in FOIA ID 2025-EPA-04883.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005921
|
1 |
|
Kincaid Generation submitted a request for a 2-year exemption from the fPM standard and PM CEMS requirement to the EPA, citing technological unavailability and high costs associated with compliance, as detailed in their correspondence dated September 10, 2025.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005931
|
1 |
|
EPA received a request from Miami Fort Power Company for a two-year exemption from the revised fPM standard and PM CEMS requirement due to technological unavailability, as outlined in FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005936
|
1 |
|
EPA's interim release regarding FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883 discusses Coleto Creek's request for a two-year exemption from the fPM standard and PM CEMS requirement due to unavailability of necessary technology and national security interests.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005948
|
1 |
|
On March 31, 2025, Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC submitted a request to the EPA for a two-year exemption from the fPM standard and PM CEMS requirement for Baldwin Units 1 & 2, citing technological unavailability and operational challenges.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005953
|
1 |
|
NERC's 2024 report highlights risks in the MISO region's power grid, noting that coal and gas generator retirements could impact energy reliability for military installations in South Dakota, including Ellsworth Air Force Base.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005962
|
1 |
|
Minnkota's testing indicates that the brominated PAC technology is ineffective for consistent mercury emissions control at Coyote Station, failing to meet the new compliance standards by the July 6, 2027 deadline.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005968
|
1 |
|
On March 31, 2025, PPES submitted a request for a two-year exemption from the revised particulate matter standard due to technological unavailability and operational challenges associated with compliance, as outlined in their detailed justification.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005974
|
1 |
|
Indorama Ventures submitted a letter to the EPA on March 16, 2024, requesting an extension of national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants related to ethylene oxide, citing national security risks and the critical nature of EO in manufacturing.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005993
|
1 |
|
Indorama Ventures submitted concerns regarding EPA's hazardous air pollutant regulations, citing challenges with ethylene oxide detection, costly emission controls, and compliance deadlines in a letter dated September 10, 2025, under FOIA ID 2025-EPA-04883.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0005999
|
1 |
|
Indorama Ventures Oxides LLC submitted an extension request on October 13, 2024, seeking a two-year compliance period extension for emission control projects mandated by the EPA's final rule on hazardous air pollutants, effective July 15, 2024.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006002
|
1 |
|
Indorama's compliance schedule for emission control projects at the Port Neches Facility includes planned construction starting October 1, 2024, with completion by March 31, 2029, while acknowledging potential delays and the need for additional relief from EPA compliance deadlines.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006006
|
1 |
|
The EPA's interim release for FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883 discusses the environmental and economic implications of the Lime Rule, arguing that compliance is not feasible with available technology and poses national security risks.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006024
|
1 |
|
On September 10, 2025, Panther Creek Power submitted an exemption request to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin regarding the MATS Rule, seeking additional time to comply with emission standards for coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006040
|
1 |
|
Hugo Generating Station's MATS Presidential Exemption Request discusses the implications of regulatory changes on coal-based electric generation units and the potential for capacity shortfalls, citing concerns from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and referencing President Trump's National Energy Emergency declaration.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006061
|
1 |
|
NorthWestern Energy's report outlines concerns regarding its capacity to meet customer demands due to expiring market contracts and reliance on market purchases, emphasizing the need for additional peaking and flexible capacity resources.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006150
|
1 |
|
Declaration by Dale E. Lebsack, Jr., President of Talen Montana, submitted in USCA Case #24-1190 on June 27, 2024, supporting petitioners' motion to stay a final rule.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006165
|
1 |
|
A declaration submitted by the President of Talen Montana in support of a joint motion to stay the EPA's Mercury and Air Toxics Standards final rule, detailing the impact on Talen Montana's operations and economic interests.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006166
|
1 |
|
Talen Montana operates Units 3 and 4 at the Colstrip Power Plant in Montana, which has a combined capacity of 1,480 MW and plays a key role in regional electricity supply.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006167
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses the financial implications of the MATS Final Rule on Colstrip, estimating compliance costs over $350 million and potential severe economic consequences for Montana.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006168
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses the contentious compliance issues among Colstrip's owners regarding the MATS Final Rule and the potential financial implications of emissions control installations.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006169
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses Talen Montana's compliance options and financial implications related to Colstrip's ownership structure and the MATS Final Rule.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006170
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses the operational differences between Talen Montana as a merchant power producer and traditional regulated utilities regarding cost recovery and market exposure.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006171
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses ownership interests and regulatory impacts on Colstrip Units 3 and 4, co-owned by Talen Montana and several utilities, in light of Oregon and Washington's clean energy laws.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006173
|
1 |
|
Market price volatility for electricity affects Talen Montana's ability to recover costs for pollution control investments, complicating long-term planning and decision-making among Colstrip's six owners due to differing financial motivations and regulatory considerations.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006172
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses the regulatory compliance of Colstrip units in Washington and Oregon, detailing ownership interests and the impact of state laws on coal-fired power plants.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006174
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses Talen Montana's position on compliance with the MATS Final Rule and the contentious future of the Colstrip plant among its owners.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006175
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on 06/27/2024 discusses the ongoing litigation and arbitration among Colstrip's owners regarding retirement plans and compliance with the MATS Final Rule.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006176
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on 06/27/2024 discusses financial risks and disputes among Colstrip owners regarding compliance with the MATS Final Rule and the implications of installing new emissions control systems.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006178
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses Talen Montana's operational challenges as the Colstrip operator amid differing business models and regulatory considerations among co-owners.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006177
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses the MATS Final Rule's stringent fPM limits, requiring Colstrip to potentially invest over $350 million in new emissions control systems or face premature retirement by July 8, 2027.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006179
|
1 |
|
Burns & McDonnell's April 2024 evaluation outlines Talen Montana's ongoing efforts to estimate costs and engineering for pollution control equipment to comply with the MATS Final Rule, anticipating a $350 million project timeline extending to 2027.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006180
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses the implications of the MATS Final Rule on Talen Montana and Colstrip owners regarding compliance deadlines and potential disputes over pollution control investments.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006181
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses Talen Montana's considerations regarding pollution control investments and operational timelines for the Colstrip facility in light of the GHG Rule and MATS Final Rule.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006182
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses Talen Montana's inability to recoup compliance costs for the MATS Final Rule, estimating annualized capital costs of $109 million to $133 million, potentially leading to Colstrip's premature retirement.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006183
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on 06/27/2024 discusses Talen Montana's operational risks and compliance efforts at Colstrip, noting its fPM emissions consistently below EPA's MATS limit since 2018.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006184
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses Talen Montana's concerns regarding regulatory uncertainty from the MATS Final Rule and GHG Rule affecting Colstrip's operational decisions and compliance costs.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006185
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses Talen Montana's compliance efforts with the MATS Final Rule and the implications for Colstrip's owners amid potential disputes and significant costs.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006186
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on 06/27/2024 discusses the potential economic impacts of the MATS Final Rule on Talen Montana and the Colstrip plant, emphasizing the urgency of decisions amid ongoing litigation.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006187
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, includes a statement from Dale E. Lebsack, Jr., President of Talen Montana, regarding the economic contributions of Colstrip and the potential harm from the MATS Final Rule.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006189
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, discusses the economic impact of Colstrip's potential early closure on Montana, projecting significant job losses, income reduction, and tax revenue decline.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006188
|
1 |
|
Attachment A to the Declaration of Dale E. Lebsack, Jr. includes select excerpts from the Burns & McDonnell Study related to the Sierra Club FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883, filed on June 27, 2024.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006190
|
1 |
|
A confidential evaluation report titled 'Co'strip Particulate Matter Control Cost Evaluation - Final,' prepared by Burns & McDonnell for Talen Montana, was filed on June 27, 2024, under USCA Case #24-1190.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006191
|
1 |
|
Final evaluation report on Colstrip Steam Electric Station emissions control technologies, including cost analyses and descriptions of Pulse-Jet Fabric Filters and Dry Electrostatic Precipitators, filed under USCA Case #24-1190 on April 29, 2024.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006192
|
1 |
|
Burns & McDonnell conducted a cost evaluation for two particulate control options to comply with the proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule, detailing capital and operational costs for an Electrostatic Precipitator and a fabric filter as part of FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006193
|
1 |
|
Final evaluation report for USCA Case #24-1190 detailing capital cost estimates for the Colstrip Power Station's fabric filter and ESP, filed by Burns & McDonnell on April 29, 2024.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006194
|
1 |
|
The April 29, 2024, evaluation report for Colstrip Units 3 and 4 outlines operation and maintenance cost estimates for particulate emissions control options, recommending fabric filters with a total capital cost of $356,426,000 and an annual O&M cost of $14,786,000.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006195
|
1 |
|
The April 29, 2024, report evaluates compliance options for reducing filterable particulate matter emissions at the Colstrip Steam Electric Station in Montana, detailing cost estimates for installing new pollution control technologies.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006196
|
1 |
|
Final evaluation report by Burns & McDonnell dated April 29, 2024, detailing cost estimates for equipment related to a project, including limitations on projections due to various uncontrollable factors.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006197
|
1 |
|
Final evaluation of emission reduction technologies for the Colstrip facility, detailing the pulse-jet fabric filter and electrostatic precipitator as potential solutions to meet MATS particulate emissions regulations, dated April 29, 2024.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006198
|
1 |
|
Final evaluation of emission reduction technology, specifically detailing the pulse-jet fabric filter process, filed under USCA Case #24-1190 on April 29, 2024, as part of FOIA request 2025-EPA-04883.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006199
|
1 |
|
The April 29, 2024, document titled 'Emission Reduction Technology Assessment' evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of pulse-jet fabric filters for particulate matter control, detailing their operational efficiency and maintenance benefits.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006200
|
1 |
|
The April 29, 2024 evaluation report from the USCA Case #24-1190 assesses emission reduction technologies, detailing limitations of fabric filters and advantages of dry electrostatic precipitators for particulate matter control.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006201
|
1 |
|
Final evaluation report on emission reduction technology assessing dry electrostatic precipitators, detailing their operational mechanics and efficiency factors, dated April 29, 2024, under USCA Case #24-1190.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006202
|
1 |
|
USCA Case #24-1190 filed on June 27, 2024, includes a final evaluation of electrostatic precipitators, detailing their advantages and disadvantages in particulate matter removal technology.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006203
|
1 |
|
Final evaluation of emission guarantees for the Colstrip facility, dated April 29, 2024, discusses the atypical configuration of a wet particulate scrubber and the confidence of Southern Environmental Inc in meeting proposed MATS rates.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006204
|
1 |
|
Cost evaluation report for control technologies at Colstrip, detailing capital and operational costs based on vendor estimates, prepared by Burns & McDonnell, dated April 29, 2024, under FOIA ID 2025-EPA-04883.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006205
|
1 |
|
Final cost evaluation for the Colstrip Power Station's fabric filter and ESP, detailing capital costs and project estimates, filed in USCA Case #24-1190 on April 29, 2024.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006206
|
1 |
|
A cost evaluation report dated April 29, 2024, outlines the project cost estimates for the Colstrip facility, including equipment pricing, labor rates, and indirect costs, as part of USCA Case #24-1190.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006207
|
1 |
|
Final cost evaluation for the 115kV line and associated electrical systems at the facility, detailing equipment needs and integration with existing systems, dated April 29, 2024, under FOIA ID 2025-EPA-04883.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006208
|
1 |
|
Final cost evaluation for a fabric filter and ductwork design, detailing structural estimates and material quantities, prepared by Burns & McDonnell for the EPA, dated April 29, 2024, under FOIA ID 2025-EPA-04883.
|
2024 |
2025-EPA-04883 |
0006210
|
1 |